Case 2409672/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Emily Nuttall v Dragon Football Academy Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2409672/2023
- Decision date
- 25 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Tobin
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Emily Nuttall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester before Employment Judge G Tobin on 1 November 2024, dealt with the claimant's claims against Dragon Football Academy Limited on a remote video hearing basis. It found that the claimant succeeded in her claim for non-payment of wages during August 2023. The award for that claim was 10.5 days' pay at £86.53 gross per day, totalling £908.57 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant succeeded in her claim for notice pay. It awarded £432.75 gross for that claim. The judgment did not set out separate written reasons in the extracted text, and it recorded only the operative findings and sums awarded.
The respondent was ordered to pay compensation and damages totalling £1,341.32 gross. The judgment noted that the amount was gross and might be subject to deduction for tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal succeeded the claimant in her claim for non-payment of wages during August 2023 and awarded 10.5 days' pay at £86.53 gross. | Upheld | — | £909 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal succeeded the claimant in her claim for notice pay and awarded £432.75 gross. | Upheld | — | £433 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,341
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.