Case 2410511/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Level 202 Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2410511/2021
- Decision date
- 17 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 3 September 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It assessed the accrued but untaken entitlement at 0.93 weeks and ordered payment of £503.58 gross.
The judgment recorded a total award of £503.58 and stated that the respondent must account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on that sum. The accompanying interest notice stated the relevant decision day and the 8% stipulated rate, but no separate interest amount was included in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, assessed at 0.93 weeks accrued but untaken. | Upheld | — | £504 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £504
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.