Case 2411072/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kamel Lardjani v Elior UK plc — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411072/2019
- Decision date
- 10 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Price Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kamel Lardjani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered claims for unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract arising from alleged unpaid overtime at the end of the claimant's employment, together with a holiday pay claim added at the hearing. The claimant later accepted that he was not owed any outstanding holiday pay and withdrew that claim.
The tribunal found that 203 hours paid in March 2019 related to earlier overtime worked before 17 March 2019, and that for the remaining period from 18 March 2019 to 27 April 2019 the claimant's own contemporaneous handwritten record was the most reliable evidence of hours worked. Using that record, the tribunal found that 157.5 hours of daytime overtime were due beyond the claimant's contractual hours, and that the respondent in May 2019 paid 157.5 hours at the standard rate plus 14.5 hours at time and a half, reflecting 172 hours of overtime in total.
On the disputed pay rate, the tribunal accepted Mr Symons' evidence that he had not agreed to pay double time and that any enhanced-rate agreement was limited. It found, on the balance of probabilities, that the agreement to pay 1.5 times the hourly rate applied only to the 14.5 hours already paid at that rate. The tribunal therefore concluded that the claimant had been paid for the overtime hours he worked at the correct rate and that there had been no underpayment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had been paid for the overtime hours worked and at the correct rate, so there was no underpayment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | This claim turned on the same alleged underpayment of overtime and was dismissed for the same reason. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant accepted in cross-examination that no outstanding holiday pay was owed and withdrew the claim; the judgment records it as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.