Case 2411217/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Ellis v G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2411217/2021
- Decision date
- 23 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Whittaker REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Ellis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered whether the claimant could pursue breach of contract claims where the alleged breach was more than six years before the ET1 was presented. The Tribunal preferred the reasoning in Taylor v Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust to Grisanti v NBC News Worldwide, finding that the six-year limitation period under the Limitation Act 1980 applied to breach of contract claims brought under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994.
The Tribunal held that the claimant had an adequate remedy available during employment, including by bringing a small claim in the County Court, and that there was no sufficient basis to conclude that Parliament intended a longer limitation period for Employment Tribunal breach of contract claims than for civil court contract claims. It therefore dismissed any breach of contract claims relating to breaches more than six years before presentation of the ET1.
The Tribunal also considered the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claims under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Applying the Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014, the Tribunal held that it could not consider alleged deductions where the relevant payment date was more than two years before presentation of the complaint, and dismissed any such claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Only breach of contract claims where the alleged breach was more than six years before presentation of the ET1 were dismissed; the judgment does not determine any breach of contract claims within that period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Only section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 claims based on alleged deductions more than two years before presentation of the ET1 were dismissed; the judgment does not determine any unlawful deduction claims within that period. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980
- Dickie v Cathay Pacific Airways Limited
- Taylor v Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Grisanti v NBC News Worldwide
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23(4A) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.