Case 2411252/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Power v Sunshine Care (Rochdale) CIC — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411252/2023
- Decision date
- 27 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Power
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. It recorded that, by letter dated 8 May 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she had failed to prove 2 years' service.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims stayed listed for a hearing on 27 May 2025, but it does not determine those claims in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out after the Tribunal's letter dated 8 May 2024 invited representations or a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out because the claimant failed to prove 2 years' service. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.