Case 2411489/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Mallon v Future Directions CIC — 2018
- Case reference
- 2411489/2018
- Decision date
- 12 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Mallon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Manchester on 10 October 2018, before Employment Judge Howard, the tribunal recorded claims by Mr K Mallon against Future Directions CIC for direct disability discrimination, victimisation, and sex discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. The judgment states that those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal.
No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment are set out in the judgment. The decision is limited to recording the procedural disposal of the claims, and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's direct disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records that the claimant's victimisation claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's sex discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.