Case 2411494/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Statham v Oldham Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411494/2018
- Decision date
- 24 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Statham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a costs judgment by Employment Judge Franey dated 23 October 2019. The tribunal ordered Oldham Council to pay Mr K Statham £954.80 in respect of costs incurred because the hearing on 19 July 2019 had been postponed. The judge said the power to award costs had arisen and treated the earlier case management order as incorporated into the reasons.
The claimant had sought £1,831.67 plus VAT at 20%. The tribunal considered written representations from both sides and did not hold a separate hearing on quantum. It concluded that not all of the claimed work should be allowed because some of it would have been useful for the resumed hearing listed for 17 September 2019 and was therefore not wasted by the adjournment.
The tribunal disallowed time spent on the substantive skeleton argument and on consideration of the bundle, reduced the first item to 30 minutes, and disallowed some time spent between Ms Murray and Mr Norman where it exceeded a reasonable figure for discussing an adjournment. On that summary assessment, the recoverable costs were fixed at £795.67 plus VAT, making £954.80 in total.
The judgment also records that, because the 17 September hearing was cancelled, the parties had not yet agreed a list of issues based on amended claim and response forms. The claimant was directed to provide a suggested list of issues without delay, with an agreed version and chronology to be lodged by 4pm on 20 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Costs judgment under rules 75(1)(a) and 76(2) arising from the postponement of the hearing on 19 July 2019. The tribunal awarded a reduced sum after summary assessment: £795.67 plus VAT, totalling £954.80, rather than the full amount claimed. | Upheld | — | £955 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £955
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rules 75(1)(a) and 76(2) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- summary assessment
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.