Case 2411502/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Howes (lay representative) For the v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 2411502/2023
- Decision date
- 1 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms L Atkinson, Ms B Hillon
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms R Howes (lay representative) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr L Bougen’s complaint of constructive unfair dismissal against Greenwood & Coope Limited was found not well-founded and dismissed.
The Tribunal also found that the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability and the complaints of harassment related to disability were not well-founded and dismissed them. The written judgment does not record a monetary award or set out the factual findings and reasoning; summary reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a complaint of “(constructive) unfair dismissal”. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Complaints of harassment related to disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.