Case 2411520/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Bamford v The Automobile Association — 2022
- Case reference
- 2411520/2021
- Decision date
- 16 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Bamford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 26 May 2022, the Tribunal gave Miss A Bamford an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 23 March 2022 and that the matter had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Leach therefore struck out the claim. The judgment contains no substantive findings on the underlying merits and records no remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not set out the substantive pleaded issues, but the gov.uk listing for the case identified breach of contract among the categories. The claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 23 March 2022 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not set out the substantive pleaded issues, but the gov.uk listing for the case identified unlawful deduction from wages among the categories. The claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 23 March 2022 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.