Case 2411522/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Parsons v SSGC Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2411522/2021
- Decision date
- 19 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Parsons
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public via CVP at Liverpool on 10 August 2022 before Judge Brian Doyle, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel and a trainee solicitor. The tribunal dealt with limitation only.
The tribunal held that the claim was not brought within the time limitation periods contained in article 7 of the Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994, sections 23 and 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and section 123 of the Equality Act 2010, and that no extension of time was permitted under those provisions.
On that basis the claim was dismissed and all further hearings were vacated. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment referred to article 7 of the Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 and held the claim was out of time; no extension of time was permitted. The substantive contractual label is not spelled out in the extracted text, so this is the closest match. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because it was not brought within the time limit in section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and no extension of time was permitted. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because it was not brought within the time limit in section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and no extension of time was permitted. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed because it was not brought within the time limit in section 123 of the Equality Act 2010 and no extension of time was permitted. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.