Case 2411526/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Leyland v Sky Subscriber Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2411526/2021
- Decision date
- 14 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson MEMBERS
- Panel members
- Miss S Howarth, Mr A J Gill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Leyland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester on 8, 9 and 10 November 2022 before Employment Judge Johnson with lay members Miss S Howarth and Mr A J Gill, heard Mr W Leyland's complaints against Sky Subscriber Services Limited. The written judgment states that the complaint of direct sex discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaint of victimisation under section 27 Equality Act 2010. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary remedy was awarded because both claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.