Case 2411803/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mohamed Patel v Go North West Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411803/2023
- Decision date
- 16 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mohamed Patel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not provide a response to the claim and did not attend the hearing. Employment Judge Cookson therefore dealt with the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that the claimant's holiday-pay complaint was well-founded because the respondent failed to pay him for 3 days of accrued annual leave, producing a gross deduction of £554.61. It also found that a separate complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to holiday pay paid was well-founded, arising from holiday taken in June 2023 and a further gross deduction of £258.93.
The tribunal treated the two deductions together as unlawful deductions of £813.54. It then applied a 25% ACAS uplift, adding £203.39, because of the respondent's unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code and the history of non-compliance when the claimant had previously raised concerns about underpayment of holiday pay. The total sum ordered to be paid was £1,016.93 within 14 days, and the claimant was held responsible for any tax or National Insurance. The notice to the parties states that no interest is payable if the sum is paid in full within 14 days after the written record of the decision was sent on 16 December 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Complaint in respect of holiday pay; the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for 3 days' accrued annual leave. | Upheld | — | £555 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to holiday pay paid for leave taken in June 2023. | Upheld | — | £259 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,017
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- ACAS Code
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.