Case 2412870/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Tucker v Lidl Great Britain Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2412870/2023
- Decision date
- 25 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Tucker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 3 July 2024, the Tribunal gave Miss Tucker an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out. The letter said she would need to confirm that she would prepare and exchange a witness statement setting out the evidence she would give in support of her claims, and warned that failure to do so was likely to lead to strike out.
Miss Tucker did not reply to the letter. The Tribunal found that she had failed to make written representations, had failed to make sufficient representations against strike out, and had not requested a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out, and the hearing listed for 9 August 2024 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the pleaded claim types individually; it records that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant failed to reply to the Tribunal's 3 July 2024 letter or make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.