Case 2413218/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Jackson v Speedy Asset Services Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2413218/2018
- Decision date
- 8 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
- Venue
- Carlisle
- Panel members
- Ms H D Price, Dr B Tirohl
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 18 June 2019 at Carlisle, before Employment Judge Holmes sitting with Ms H D Price and Dr B Tirohl, the tribunal recorded a consent judgment in which the parties said terms of settlement had been agreed between Ms N Jackson and Speedy Asset Services Ltd. The proceedings were stayed for implementation of those terms until 30 July 2019.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | Consent judgment recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed; proceedings were stayed for implementation and the claims would stand dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Settled | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Consent judgment recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed; proceedings were stayed for implementation and the claims would stand dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Settled | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Consent judgment recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed; proceedings were stayed for implementation and the claims would stand dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.