Case 2413722/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Saunders v Lifeways Paragon Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 2413722/2018
- Decision date
- 15 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Saunders
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 2 November 2018, Employment Judge Franey sitting alone dealt with the combined cases brought by Ms L Saunders against Lifeways Paragon Limited. The written judgment records that case number 2415298/2018 was dismissed on withdrawal because it duplicated case number 2413722/2018 as amended.
In case number 2413722/2018, the claimant withdrew all complaints relating to holiday pay and all complaints of unlawful deductions from pay, and those complaints were dismissed accordingly. The judgment states that the remaining complaints in case number 2413722/2018 would proceed and would be the subject of a separate Case Management Order. No merits findings, remedy award, or legal test are recorded in this written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint in case number 2415298/2018 dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant because it was a duplicate of case number 2413722/2018 (as amended). | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | All complaints in relation to holiday pay were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | All complaints of unlawful deductions from pay were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.