Case 2413814/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Smith v Just for Children (Education and Care) Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413814/2019
- Decision date
- 10 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms S Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Just For Children Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms S Smith's wages. It ordered the first respondent to pay her the gross sum of £632.17.
The tribunal also declared that the first respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements for June and July 2019. The judgment does not set out any separate monetary award for that declaration.
Any claims against Kerry Louise Driver personally were dismissed. The judgment records that the first respondent was incorporated in February 2015 and was the claimant's employer throughout her employment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The first respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was ordered to pay the gross sum of £632.17. | Upheld | — | £632 |
| Other | The tribunal declared that the first respondent failed to provide the claimant with itemised pay statements for June and July 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Any claims against the second respondent personally were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £632
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.