Case 2414077/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Johnston v Aspin Group Limited (in Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414077/2019
- Decision date
- 20 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Johnston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Phil Allen determined the case under Rule 21 on the papers. The tribunal found that Aspin Group Limited (in Administration) had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
As a result, the respondent was required to pay Mr C Johnston a protective award under section 189(1)(d) of the 1992 Act in the sum of £11,734.20. The judgment includes a standard notice explaining that sums unpaid after 14 days may carry interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 at the stipulated rate of 8%, but no separate interest amount was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award made for failure to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, under section 189(1)(d). | Upheld | — | £11,734 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,734
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.