Case 2414204/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss CL McCloskey v Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2414204/2019
- Decision date
- 28 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne Representatives
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss CL McCloskey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment dealt only with the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages identified in Row 2 of the Money Claims Table, namely the allegation that the respondent failed to pay wages properly payable for administration time. Employment Judge Horne struck out that complaint on the ground that it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The judgment states that it does not affect the claimant's ability to pursue the remainder of her claim. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and written reasons would only be provided if requested in writing within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint in Row 2 of the Money Claims Table, described as failing to pay wages that were properly payable for administration time, was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.