Case 2414354/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Amegadzie v Amazon UK Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414354/2019
- Decision date
- 16 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Amegadzie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims against Amazon UK Services Ltd for unlawful deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and harassment contrary to section 26 of the Equality Act 2010.
Employment Judge Ainscough, sitting alone, recorded that both claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unlawful deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the harassment claim contrary to section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment text does not specify the protected characteristic relied on. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 26 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.