Case 2414559/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Khan v Park Cakes Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414559/2018
- Decision date
- 21 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr S Khan
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 31 October 2019, the tribunal ordered the claimant to pay a deposit of at least £31.25 and no more than £500 in order to pursue all or part of his claims against one or both respondents. The order was sent to the claimant on 26 November 2019, and the time for payment was later extended to 17 January 2020.
The claimant did not pay any deposit. On that basis, Employment Judge Franey recorded that all of the claimant's complaints were struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment states that the case was at an end. No substantive findings were made on the merits of the complaints, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment does not specify the underlying factual complaint in this short decision; it states that all complaints were struck out after the claimant failed to pay the ordered deposit. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment does not separate the complaints by head of claim. It records that the claimant failed to pay any deposit and that all complaints were struck out under rule 39(4). | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.