Case 2414998/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Jules v Liverpool Road Leisure Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2414998/2021
- Decision date
- 9 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Jules
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge made a determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £540.
The tribunal also dismissed the redundancy payment claim because the claimant had less than two years' service. The written judgment records that all claims against GN Hospitality Limited were dismissed. The separate notice on interest explains the applicable interest mechanism, but the judgment itself does not specify any interest sum as part of the award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £540 under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £540 |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the claimant had less than two years' service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | All claims against GN Hospitality Limited were dismissed, but the extracted text does not specify a separate legal head for that respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £540
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.