Case 2415014/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Brant v Lyndon-Dykes Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2415014/2019
- Decision date
- 19 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Whittaker
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Brant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 13 March 2020 before Employment Judge Whittaker sitting alone. Neither Miss C Brant nor Lyndon Dykes Limited attended the hearing.
The judgment records that, because there was no appearance by either party, the claimant's claims were dismissed. No substantive findings on liability were made, and the judgment does not identify any monetary award.
The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive jurisdictional claim type; it states only that, because neither party appeared at the hearing, the claimant's claims were dismissed. The gov.uk listing for the case identifies Unlawful Deduction from Wages, but that label is not stated in the judgment text itself. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.