Case 2415097/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Rebecca Brown v Just for Children (Education and Care) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2415097/2021
- Decision date
- 5 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Members
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mr I Frame, Dr B Tirohl
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Rebecca Brown
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 22 August 2023, the tribunal recorded that enquiries had been made with the parties and that neither the claimant nor the respondent attended. The hearing therefore proceeded under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, and the decision was unanimous.
The tribunal dismissed Miss Rebecca Brown's claims of unfair dismissal, pregnancy or maternity discrimination, non-payment of wages, notice pay, outstanding holiday pay and redundancy pay. The written record does not set out substantive reasons in detail, because it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
The proceedings were dismissed in full. No monetary award or remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records this as "non-payment of wages"; mapped to unlawful deduction from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records this as "notice pay"; mapped to breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records this as "outstanding holiday pay"; mapped to holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.