Case 2415424/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Challenor v Greater Manchester Buses South Ltd t/a Stagecoach Manchester — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415424/2021
- Decision date
- 6 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Challenor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs J Challenor brought connected proceedings against Greater Manchester Buses South Limited t/a Stagecoach Manchester under case numbers 2415424/2021 and 2400203/2022. The written judgment dated 6 October 2022 records only that the claim was struck out; it does not set out any merits findings or any remedy in the text provided.
The tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing, so the tribunal struck out the claim and stated that the hearing listed for 21 November 2022 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment only records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; it does not separately address this complaint. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The written judgment only records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; it does not separately address this complaint. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The written judgment only records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; it does not separately address this complaint. | Struck out | Sexual orientation | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment only records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; it does not separately address this complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
| Victimisation | The written judgment only records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; it does not separately address this complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.