Case 2415816/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Wilcoxson v Travis Perkins Trading Company Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2415816/2020
- Decision date
- 23 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Wilcoxson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 20 May 2021, the tribunal gave Miss L Wilcoxson an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that she failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not go into the merits of any underlying complaint, and it records that the hearing listed for 24 November, 25 November and 26 November 2021 would not take place. The decision was signed by Employment Judge McDonald on 18 June 2021 and sent to the parties on 23 June 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separate the underlying heads; the case listing categories identify breach of contract as one of the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separate the underlying heads; the case listing categories identify unlawful deduction from wages as one of the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.