Case 2416558/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Salazar v Manchester Metropolitan University and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416558/2019
- Decision date
- 7 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Salazar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment is a short disposal order. It records that the claims against the second respondent, Ruth McQuater, were dismissed on withdrawal. No substantive findings of fact, liability findings, or legal analysis are set out in the extracted text.
The judgment does not record any monetary award or remedy. No separate award is attributed to any claim, and no other adjudicated outcome appears in the extracted text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states: 'The claims against the second respondent are dismissed on withdrawal.' No substantive merits findings are recorded in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.