Case 2416867/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mr W Crawford First v Second Respondent: Third Respondent: Sopra Steria Recruitment Limited NHS Oldham CCG t/a Greater Manchester Shared Services Parasol Limited — 2019

Case reference: 2416867/2018
Decision date: 28 March 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Howard REPRESENTATION

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr W Crawford First

Respondent

Second Respondent: Third Respondent: Sopra Steria Recruitment Limited NHS Oldham CCG t/a Greater Manchester Shared Services Parasol Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the hearing on 7 March 2019 before Employment Judge Howard, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The claims included age discrimination, disability discrimination, discrimination because of gender reassignment, and harassment under the Equality Act 2010.

The judgment also recorded claims for unfair dismissal and automatically unfair dismissal under sections 98 and 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Those claims were likewise dismissed upon withdrawal.

No findings on liability, remedy, or compensation are set out in the judgment text, and no monetary award is recorded.

Claims and outcomes

6 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Age discrimination	The judgment states the age discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal.	Withdrawn	Age	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment states the disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal.	Withdrawn	Disability	—
Gender reassignment discrimination	The judgment states the claim of discrimination because of gender reassignment was dismissed upon withdrawal.	Withdrawn	Gender reassignment	—
Harassment	The judgment states the harassment claim under the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed upon withdrawal.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states the unfair dismissal claim under s.98 ERA 1996 was dismissed upon withdrawal.	Withdrawn	—	—
Whistleblowing	The judgment states the automatically unfair dismissal claim under s.103A ERA 1996 was dismissed upon withdrawal.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

6 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.