Case 2416884/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Allen v Paradigm Precision Burnley Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416884/2018
- Decision date
- 20 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P Allen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld harassment related to sexual orientation against the first respondent on the listed conduct between 12 March and 5 June 2018: being called camp, limp-wristed hand gestures, an email depicting stereotypical gay characters, a passport photograph left in the workplace with a handwritten note, and a question at a work event about his preferred type of man. All other harassment allegations were dismissed. It also upheld direct sexual orientation discrimination in the rejection for Operations Director and then General Manager of the Burnley site, communicated on 5 June 2018; all other direct discrimination allegations were dismissed.
Victimisation was upheld on the finding that he was isolated between late August and late October 2018 during a grievance process and the appointment of a temporary replacement. A detriment claim under the Paternity and Adoption Leave Regulations 2002 and/or s47C ERA 1996 was also upheld on the same rejection decisions, because he sought additional adoption leave and/or was believed likely to take it. All Equality Act claims against the second respondent were dismissed as out of time, with no extension of time as just and equitable.
The claimant also succeeded in constructive unfair dismissal. The unfair dismissal award was £3,048 basic award plus £18,478 compensatory award, £1,847.82 pension loss and £500 for loss of statutory rights, giving £23,873.82, with recoupment regulations applying and a prescribed amount of £20,325.82. The EqA and Regulations award totalled £96,645.40, comprising £26,300 injury to feelings, £45,586.68 financial loss, £18,126.72 future loss and £6,632 interest. The parties agreed a 15% ACAS uplift of £18,077.92, taking the total before tax grossing-up to £138,597.34; a further grossing-up amount of £36,047.66 produced a total amount payable of £174,645.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Upheld for being called camp, limp-wristed hand gestures, a stereotyping email, a passport photograph left out with a handwritten note, and a question about his preferred type of man at a work event; other harassment allegations were dismissed. One subparagraph uses 2020, but the surrounding chronology is 2018. | Upheld | Sexual orientation | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Upheld in relation to the rejection for Operations Director and then General Manager of the Burnley site, with the decision communicated on 5 June 2018; other direct discrimination allegations were dismissed. | Upheld | Sexual orientation | — |
| Victimisation | Upheld on the finding that he was isolated between late August and late October 2018 during a grievance process and the appointment of a temporary replacement; other victimisation allegations were dismissed. | Upheld | Sexual orientation | — |
| Parental leave | Upheld because he sought additional adoption leave and/or was believed likely to take it, reflected in the rejection for Operations Director and then General Manager; other detriment allegations were dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal succeeded. | Upheld | — | £23,874 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £174,645
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,048
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £20,826
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
9 references- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
- Paternity and Adoption Leave Regulations 2002
- section 47C Employment Rights Act 1996
- just and equitable to extend time
- section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- recoupment regulations
- Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.