Mr M Lesbirel-Bray v Potensial Ltd — 2022

Case reference: 2417101/2019
Decision date: 9 May 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
Panel members: Ms J Newsham, Mr T D Wilson

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M Lesbirel-Bray

Respondent

Potensial Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a hearing in Liverpool by CVP on 4 and 5 May 2022, Employment Judge A.M.S. Green sat with Ms J Newsham and Mr T D Wilson to hear Mr M Lesbirel-Bray's claims against Potensial Ltd. The tribunal's unanimous decision was that the claims for direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and harassment were dismissed.

The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. It also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The judgment records this as a direct disability discrimination claim. The unanimous decision was that it was dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment records this as a claim for discrimination arising from disability. The unanimous decision was that it was dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Harassment	The judgment records this as a harassment claim. The unanimous decision was that it was dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.