Case 2417414/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Itiokiet v B&M Retail Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2417414/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
- Venue
- Liverpool
- Panel members
- Mr D Williamson, Mt T Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Itiokiet
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr Itiokiet brought claims against B & M Retail Limited for harassment, victimisation and direct race discrimination.
The written judgment states that all three claims failed and were dismissed. The record says reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment states that the claim of harassment failed and was dismissed. The protected characteristic is inferred from the judgment's reference to direct race discrimination and the listing category. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the claim of victimisation failed and was dismissed. No protected characteristic is expressly attached to this claim in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of direct race discrimination failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.