Case 2417447/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Clayton v Manchester Metropolitan University — 2021
- Case reference
- 2417447/2020
- Decision date
- 15 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Clayton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 9 September 2021, the Tribunal gave Mr D Clayton an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because he had failed to comply with case management orders and the matter had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Dunlop struck out the claim. The extracted judgment does not identify any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant failed to make representations, or sufficient representations, in response to a letter dated 9 September 2021; the extracted text does not identify the underlying substantive heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.