Case 2418147/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alan Morris v DHL Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2418147/2020
- Decision date
- 3 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alan Morris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the case at Liverpool Tribunal by CVP on 18 and 19 October 2022 before Judge Miller-Varey sitting alone. The claimant was Mr Alan Morris and the respondent was DHL Services Limited.
The Tribunal dismissed the claim for unfair dismissal, finding that it was not well-founded. It also dismissed the claim for wrongful dismissal on the same stated basis. The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested; no such request was made at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim for unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the claim for wrongful dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.