Case 2418320/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Clark v Boots Management Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2418320/2020
- Decision date
- 28 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
- Panel members
- Mr D Williamson, Mrs JE Williams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Clark
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that allegations numbered 1.1(a) to (h) had not been presented within the three-month time limit beginning with the act complained of, or when it was treated as done. It found that it was not just and equitable to extend time, and those complaints were dismissed.
The remaining age and sex discrimination claims, including allegation 1.1(i), were dismissed. The Tribunal stated that the claimant had not been unlawfully discriminated against on the grounds of sex or age. It also dismissed the disability discrimination claims under sections 13 and 19 of the Equality Act 2010 as not well-founded.
The Tribunal further held that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. The unfair dismissal complaint was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Allegations 1.1(a) to (h) were dismissed as out of time with no just and equitable extension. The remaining age discrimination claims, including allegation 1.1(i), were dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | Allegations 1.1(a) to (h) were dismissed as out of time with no just and equitable extension. The remaining sex discrimination claims, including allegation 1.1(i), were dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The judgment refers to remaining age and sex discrimination claims brought under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010, but does not separate the section 26 allegations by protected characteristic in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claims of disability discrimination under sections 13 and 19 of the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 19 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.