Case 2418770/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Marlow v Rectory C.E. Primary School — 2025
- Case reference
- 2418770/2020
- Decision date
- 15 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Marlow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe combined judgment for ET numbers 2418770/2020 and 2419848/2020 records no merits findings on the underlying claims. By a letter dated 22 May 2025, the tribunal gave Ms C Marlow an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued.
Ms Marlow did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claims. The judgment, approved by Employment Judge M Butler and sent to the parties on 15 July 2025, records no award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | Underlying claim type inferred from the published GOV.UK listing for the combined decision; the judgment text itself only states that the claims were struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Underlying claim type inferred from the published GOV.UK listing for the combined decision; the judgment text itself only states that the claims were struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.