Case 2420157/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Talbot Ms W Griffiths v The Governors of Hope Academy — 2024
- Case reference
- 2420157/2020
- Decision date
- 30 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Talbot Ms W Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 1 November 2023, the Tribunal gave Ms Talbot and Ms Griffiths an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, as to why their claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims. The judgment records no merits findings and no monetary award; it was sent to the parties on 30 January 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | The short judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; this classification follows the source listing category Part Time Workers and Working Time Regulations. The judgment itself only records that the claims were struck out because they were not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The short judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; this classification follows the source listing category Part Time Workers and Working Time Regulations. The judgment itself only records that the claims were struck out because they were not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.