Case 2500014/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Karl Moloney v Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500014/2019
- Decision date
- 9 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Members
- Venue
- Teesside Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr D Cattell, Mr R Dobson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Karl Moloney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Teesside Hearing Centre on 7 and 8 October 2019 before Employment Judge Arullendran with members Mr D Cattell and Mr R Dobson, heard Mr Karl Moloney's claim against Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services UK Limited. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The unanimous judgment was that the claimant's claim of detriment contrary to the Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010 was both out of time and not well-founded. On that basis, the claim was dismissed.
The judgment records no financial award and no separate remedy findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim was for detriment contrary to the Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010. The tribunal found it was both out of time and not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.