Case 2500065/2019 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr K Carter (2) Mr D Hopper (3) Mr S Littlemore (4) Mr W B Long (5) Mr T Todd v Steadfast Security Solutions Limited and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500065/2019
- Decision date
- 4 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S.Green Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mr K Carter (2) Mr D Hopper (3) Mr S Littlemore (4) Mr W B Long (5) Mr T Todd
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that there was a relevant transfer, specifically a service provision change, from Steadfast Security Solutions Limited to Alpha Security with effect from 7 December 2018. The written judgment states that this conclusion was reached pursuant to regulation 3(1)(b)(ii) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.
The written record does not set out extended reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing, and it notes that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment recorded that there was a relevant transfer, described as a service provision change, from the First Respondent to the Second Respondent with effect from 7 December 2018 under regulation 3(1)(b)(ii) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 3(1)(b)(ii) TUPE 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.