Case 2500086/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mr H Qureshi v Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs — 2019

Case reference: 2500086/2018
Decision date: 1 February 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Johnson
Venue: North Shields Hearing Centre

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr H Qureshi

Respondent

Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records the outcome of individual allegations in the claimant's Scott Schedule. Four claims described as unlawful race discrimination were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.

Five further claims were struck out and dismissed under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that they had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment does not set out factual reasons for those strike-outs beyond that stated ground.

The Tribunal granted the claimant's application to amend the remaining claims identified in applications dated 11 October 2018 and 11 January 2019. The claims left to be decided were five allegations of harassment under section 26 Equality Act 2010 and one allegation of victimisation under section 27 Equality Act 2010.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	Claims 6, 9, 13 and 15 were described as claims of unlawful race discrimination and were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	Race	—
Other	Claims 5, 7, 8, 10 and 14 were struck out and dismissed under Rule 37 on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment does not identify the legal character or protected characteristic of these claims.	Struck out	—	—
Harassment	Allegations 1, 2, 3, 4 and 11 were permitted to proceed as allegations of harassment contrary to section 26 Equality Act 2010; they were expressly left to be decided by the Tribunal.	Other	—	—
Victimisation	Allegation 12 was permitted to proceed as an allegation of victimisation contrary to section 27 Equality Act 2010; it was expressly left to be decided by the Tribunal.	Other	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.