Case 2500127/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Stronach v Bristol Street Fourth Investments Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500127/2022
- Decision date
- 11 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moss
- Panel members
- Mrs S Don, Mr P Curtis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Stronach
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Ms M Stronach was automatically unfairly dismissed under s103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because she had made a protected disclosure. It awarded her £5,085.20 as a compensatory award for 52 weeks' loss of earnings, calculated by reference to 8 weeks at £446.72, 34 weeks at £38.71, and 10 weeks at £19.53.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal under s103A Employment Rights Act 1996 for making a protected disclosure. | Upheld | — | £5,085 |
| Whistleblowing | Public interest disclosure detriments succeeded in part only. The tribunal found detriments in relation to six acts between 23 and 25 September 2021 involving Lee Stewart, and dismissed all other alleged detriments. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,085
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,085
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s103A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.