Case 2500157/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Banister v St Cuthberts House — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500157/2022
- Decision date
- 29 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Banister
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Newcastle Employment Tribunals on 5 February 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Martin determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s claims for unlawful deductions from wages and breach of the Working Time Regulations in relation to holiday pay succeeded. The judgment does not set out the underlying amount of any award because remedy was left for a separate hearing.
The remedy to which the claimant is entitled was to be determined at a Remedy Hearing listed for 19 April 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded as a breach of the Working Time Regulations (Holiday Pay) and determined under Rule 21 after no valid response was filed in time. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.