Case 2500282/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Connon v Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500282/2022
- Decision date
- 27 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Connon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Miss K Connon's claim against Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust. The reasons record that an order sent on 27 July 2022 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with tribunal orders and had not actively pursued the case.
The Tribunal identified several failures: inadequate compliance with the order of 18 May 2022 requiring details of the provisions, criteria or practices relied on for the indirect sex discrimination claim; failure to disclose documents by 22 June 2022; failure to liaise with the respondent about an agreed bundle; failure to provide a witness statement by 15 July 2022; failure to respond to the Tribunal's letter of 15 July 2022; and non-attendance at the preliminary hearing listed for 25 July 2022. The claimant did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing in response, so the claim was struck out on 16 August 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment refers to the claimant's claim of indirect sex discrimination. It was struck out for non-compliance with tribunal orders and failure to actively pursue the claim; there was no merits determination. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.