Case 2500292/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Welsh v The Chief Constable of Northumbria Police — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500292/2024
- Decision date
- 12 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
- Venue
- Newcastle
- Panel members
- L Jackson, SJ Lie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Welsh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss L Welsh brought a complaint of disability discrimination against the Chief Constable of Northumbria Police. The tribunal, sitting at Newcastle on 10 to 12 February 2025 before Employment Judge Sweeney with lay members L Jackson and SJ Lie, held that the complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it.
The written record supplied here does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasons, beyond the formal dismissal of the disability discrimination complaint. No monetary remedy was awarded in the decision record provided, and the judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of disability discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.