Case 2500416/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Snowdon v Team RH Fitness Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500416/2023
- Decision date
- 6 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy
- Venue
- Newcastle
- Panel members
- Mrs D Newey, Mr S Wykes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Snowdon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle before Employment Judge Loy, Mrs D Newey and Mr S Wykes, with hearings on 25, 26, 29 and 30 April 2024, 1, 2 and 3 May 2024, followed by deliberations on 3 July 2024 and an oral judgment on 5 August 2024. The claimant, Mr R Snowdon, brought claims against Team RH Fitness Limited.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability; held not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising in consequence of disability; held not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination; held not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination; held not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments; held not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination; held not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Sexual harassment claim; held not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.