Case 2500481/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Mackenzie First v South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Second Respondent: Mr Raghib Hanif — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500481/2022
- Decision date
- 9 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Brenda
- Venue
- Teesside
- Panel members
- Brenda Kirby, Gerard Gallagher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Mackenzie First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Mackenzie, a senior nurse in A&E at James Cook University Hospital, alleged that Mr Hanif harassed her related to race and/or religion by making and repeating false allegations after the 29 April 2021 changing-room incident. The tribunal heard that the dispute began when she told him to leave the changing room and return to work before the all-clear had been given, and it accepted that he later complained to HR that he had been singled out and treated differently because of his race and religion.
The tribunal found that most of Mr Hanif's statements about the changing-room incident and the later workplace exchanges were not made in bad faith. It accepted that he had spoken to Debbie Appleton, the NMC, John Seed and others because he genuinely believed he had been spoken to firmly and unfairly, and because he perceived that treatment as linked to race or religion. It rejected the suggestion that he had knowingly lied about the core events, and it also found that the allegation that he had spread rumours that Mrs Mackenzie had been suspended was not proved.
The tribunal did, however, find that Mr Hanif told Tony Moore on 6 April 2022 that Mrs Mackenzie had walked into the male changing room while he was praying and had pulled him off his prayer mat by his ear. It found that this account was false and was made knowingly in bad faith. Even so, the tribunal held that the remark was a private conversation not intended for Mrs Mackenzie, that it was not made for the purpose of violating her dignity or creating the proscribed environment, and that it did not in fact have that effect on her in the circumstances. The harassment complaint was therefore dismissed and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The tribunal dismissed the harassment complaint related to race and/or religion in full. It found that most of the allegations said to be maliciously made by Mr Hanif were not shown to have been made in bad faith, and although it found that his remarks to Tony Moore on 6 April 2022 were false and made in bad faith, it held that they were not made for the purpose of violating Mrs Mackenzie's dignity or creating the proscribed environment and did not have that effect. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
13 references- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.27(3) Equality Act 2010
- s.40 Equality Act 2010
- s.136 Equality Act 2010
- Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal
- Greasley-Adams v Royal Mail Group Limited
- Pemberton v Inwood
- Saad v Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Shamoon
- Hewage v Grampian Health Board
- Madarassy v Nomura International plc
- Igen Ltd v Wong
- Cam v Matrix Service Development and Training Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.