Case 2500553/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Vincent v Stockton Care — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500553/2022
- Decision date
- 27 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Vincent
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was decided under Rule 21. The tribunal found that Stockton Care Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr J Vincent's wages in relation to December 2021 pay, and it ordered the respondent to pay £333.30.
The tribunal also found that, following termination of employment, the respondent had failed to pay the full amount due under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It ordered payment of £526.21 for that claim. The hearing listed for 14 July 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of pay for December 2021 and ordered payment of £333.30. | Upheld | — | £333 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the full amount due on termination under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of £526.21. | Upheld | — | £526 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £860
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.