Case 2500848/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Clark v Caversham Finance (trading As Brighthouse) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500848/2020
- Decision date
- 19 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Clark
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Mr I Clark's claim against Caversham Finance (trading as Brighthouse) under rule 37. The tribunal said that by a letter dated 9 September 2020 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Sweeney held that the claim should be struck out. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify a substantive cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.