Case 2500882/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Gemma Robson v Tavistock Hospitality Limited HELD at Newcastle CFCTC — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500882/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Members
- Panel members
- Ms P Wright, Ms L Jackson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Gemma Robson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 26 and 27 February 2024 before Employment Judge Johnson, with Ms P Wright and Ms L Jackson as members, the tribunal dismissed Ms Gemma Robson’s disability discrimination complaints. The claims of direct discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 and harassment related to disability under section 26 were both found not well-founded and were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination contrary to section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability contrary to section 26 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | Failure to pay notice pay; award described as wages in lieu of notice, net amount. | Upheld | — | £1,776 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Failure to pay accrued holiday pay; award stated to be a gross amount. | Upheld | — | £648 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages; award stated to be a gross amount. | Upheld | — | £45 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,469
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.