Case 2501012/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Smith v Ethical Pay Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501012/2024
- Decision date
- 30 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 25 September 2024 at Newcastle, Employment Judge Martin heard the case with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance or representation for the respondent. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages was well founded and ordered Ethical Pay Limited to pay £2,245.64 net. It also held that the claimant’s complaint of breach of the Working Time Regulations, described as holiday pay, was well founded and ordered payment of £410.95 net.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim found well founded; tribunal ordered payment of £2,245.64 net. | Upheld | — | £2,246 |
| Working time regulations | Complaint of breach of the Working Time Regulations relating to holiday pay found well founded; tribunal ordered payment of £410.95 net. | Upheld | — | £411 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,657
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.