Case 2501176/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Daniel Hart v Birmingham Neoglory Ltd and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 2501176/2018
- Decision date
- 5 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Garnon
- Panel members
- Ms A Tarn, Mr S J Li
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr Daniel Hart
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Daniel Hart worked for Birmingham Neoglory Ltd at the Amon shop in the Gateshead Metrocentre from 25 November 2017 to 3 February 2018. The tribunal accepted that he was at times acting manager after Ms Amanda Tilney left on 24 December 2017, and found that R1 was his employer. It also found, on the balance of probabilities, that Ms Karen Price and Ms Linda Zhang otherwise known as Linda Xiong were employees or agents of R1 for the purposes of liability under the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal accepted evidence that R2 told the claimant not to disclose that he was bisexual to R3 because R3 would not understand, and that R3 asked whether he was gay and said the claimant seemed acceptable. It also found that R2 later told the claimant not to hire non-gay men and not to hire black or Asian people, and that R3 had also expressed racist views to Ms Tilney. The tribunal held that these remarks and instructions related to race, sex and sexual orientation, were unwanted, and had the effect of violating the claimant's dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.
The tribunal found it unlikely that the conduct was done with the purpose of harassing the claimant, but held that it plainly had that effect and that it was reasonable for it to have that effect. It assessed injury to feelings as significant and in the higher part of the lower band, accepted the claimant's suggested figure of £5,000, and added aggravated damages of 40% because of the respondents' conduct in the proceedings, including difficulty tracing R2 and incomplete or misleading information. The award was £7,000 compensation plus £840 interest at 8%, with the respondents jointly and severally liable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The tribunal found harassment contrary to s.40 Equality Act 2010 by all three respondents. The conduct was found to relate to race, sex and sexual orientation; the award of £7,000 was joint and several, with interest separately awarded. | Upheld | — | £7,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,840
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.40 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.109 Equality Act 2010
- s.110 Equality Act 2010
- s.111 Equality Act 2010
- Wethersfield Ltd t/a Truck and Van Rental v Sergeant
- Zaiwalla v Walia & Co
- Way v Crouch
- Munchkins Restaurant v Karmazyn
- London Borough of Hackney v Sivanandan
- Miles v Gilbank
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.