Case 2501275/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Shane Carberry v Stockton Care — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501275/2020
- Decision date
- 24 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Shane Carberry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Arullendran found that Mr Shane Carberry's claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for unauthorised deduction of wages was well founded against Stockton Care Limited. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £328.40 gross to the claimant, with the usual tax and national insurance consequences stated in the judgment.
The judgment records a total award of £328.40 and does not set out any separate basic award, compensatory award, interest, or other heads of loss.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to be well founded and ordered payment of £328.40 gross. | Upheld | — | £328 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £328
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.